Chopin's piano works are often technically demanding, emphasizing nuance and expressive depth but Chopin was not a piano maestro in the way that Liszt was. Liszt was said by his contemporaries to have been the most technically advanced pianist of his age, and this undoubtedly influenced his composition style.
On many tests, a score of 100 is considered the average IQ. Sixty-eight percent of scores fall within one standard deviation of the mean (that is,...
Read More »1888: 'The Lost Chord' This is the earliest recording of music known to exist. In 1888 a recording of Arthur Sullivan's song 'The Lost Chord' was...
Read More »Liszt's technical mastery over the piano makes his works exhilarating to listen to. There are definitely also things he wrote which are quite moving, like Piano Sonata, or many of his symphonic poems, and don't need to be crazy virtuosic in order to be profound. His paraphrased many great works for piano as well, and I regard those very highly and as very original in advancing the orchestral tone colors of the piano during that time. I couldn't do without Liszt, and I honestly don't think many composers for the piano afterwards would have done as well without him either. Chopin's music is pretty difficult to play as well, don't question that. When his Op. 10 etudes came out, they were a revolution in Europe as far as piano music - Liszt was a great technician but Chopin influenced his virtuosity. Beyond that, he was one of the most harmonically adventurous composers of his time, and explored places in music through the piano that composers had not been able to reach with the full symphony orchestra. Chopin may have understood the piano as an instrument more than anyone in his time. Liszt managed to imitate the orchestra better than anyone else on the piano. I'd argue Chopin managed to imitate the piano better than anyone else on the piano. In the area of cantabile, Chopin's music is not possible to sing (unless you have a four octave range), but it's even better done than Liszt - study the nocturnes and you'll know what I mean. So in terms of influence Liszt was greater, because he was one of the greatest proponents of Romanticism at the time, and Chopin was only very influential on the piano. However, this is not about who is more influential. I love Chopin's music more. There is a poetry of man that has been unveiled from the keys for all people to discover. No soul in the history of music was so timid and melancholy on the outside but so brave and courageous on the inside. Nobody wrote poems so intimate and fiery, danced among the fields and flowers so eloquently, hid their tears of the night so quietly, or marched along with the patriots so spirited, as Frédéric Chopin. Nobody else has such a widespread appeal across the world on the piano, not even Liszt.
Life experiences You may hear voices because of difficult experiences you've faced. In particular, abuse or other traumatic experiences. Other life...
Read More »But what is it that makes a face pretty and attractive? Different facial cosmetic features can make a face pretty when they come together. Big,...
Read More »Most people will have played the piece chopsticks on the piano at some point in their life, but now Tokyo-based composer, inventor and instrumentalist Sami Elu has built a piano made from chopsticks.
In 1990, a global treaty was signed, banning trade in all kinds of rhino or elephant ivory. Pianos with ivory keys are no longer manufactured, but...
Read More »Jesus likely understood Hebrew, though his everyday life would have been conducted in Aramaic. Of the first four books of the New Testament, the...
Read More »Recorder. Playing the recorder requires breathing techniques and coordination. The recorder is easier than other wind instruments and is the ideal...
Read More »An estimated 46 percent of Americans have taken music lessons, with piano lessons the most popular choice, followed by voice instruction, according...
Read More »